These post are my personal thoughts and comments only. They refer to my extreme displeasure that I am now looking for a new place to live after 28 years here, since I will not live in a building with a board president and managing company that refuse to follow the Business Corporation Law and our co-op proprietary lease and By-Laws. The rest of the board, have not functioned. The owner-occupied ratio dropped from 80% to about 50%.
Sunday, February 13, 2011
treasurer responsibiltes
collection of co op newsletters
collection of co-op newsletters
http://cnyc.com/pdf/nhttp://cnyc.com/pdf/newsletter-gallery/hampton-0906.gifewsletter-gallery/hampton-0906.gif
collection of co-op newsletters, we had one before the internet, however the new board stopped any information sharing
Saturday, February 12, 2011
i need to fax over the info on the ceiling and ice buildup at base of Odell stairs
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Best website for learning internet security
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
prior contractors dump their construction debris in the walls and in the ceiling, they are paid to carry it out.
manny came out and busted the ceiling ipen, we were greeted by a load of tiles , unbriken 4x4 and a load of construction debris. none of this stuff should have been in my ceiling. the plasterers worked for a full day in the bathroom, tey said thyhad to plaster above thethey tub, eventhough the leak was abive the sink, seems all the construction debris thatwas dumped there by orior contractors, added to the wet conditiond from the leak , caused the eiling tio bevery weak and needed a ful plasterjob..
in out contracts with the trdesmen, they are supposed to remove from the building all materials. we pay for this. They are not suppose to dumpo it in between the walls and floors, to make their life easierand get paqid for work they didn'tperform. There is also a hazard that they cause, if tise tiles landed on my head, that is not a normal part of a leak, that will be pursedin the courts, so i hope the BOD id checking the insurance certificates very closely of the workers. There are plenty of scams with thesecopys of insurance papers. The co-operator has a whole section on them.
So wehave contractors that are stealing from us by not removing their debris, plus caisng a haxard that the building/co-op will be liable for.
next we end up paying the plastersa lot more money, since the contractures before made their job muc harder and more time consuming.
The contracors that dumped all theirr garbage in the walls , may have not been thre plumbers that came to fix the leak this time.
which ever contracter that did the inter wall dumping/inter floor dumping, should never be allowed to worrk here again.
i wonder if it was the bunch that left my door, and no one in the apartement , wide open 3 times in one day.i will come back laterandfix the spelling and gramtcs, just wanted to get this posted
Sunday, November 14, 2010
Bedbug-sniffing dogs are raising doubts for some | Seattle Times Newspaper
There have been cases reported in nyc where exterminators have been milking the apartment owners for thousands of dollars, with no relief.
unscrupulous Exterminators can use the bedbug scare as their guaranteed income fund. Coop can get scammed out of thousands a month, and in our case that is a big problem as our BOD has never done their due diligence on any matters that i have brought to their attention, Our managing company IMO should have been replaced long ago, the rooftop waterproofing as the final straw. Over 25 years as the managing agent and they either never opened the door to walk around and inspect the roof or waited until it was a big multi thousand job to give to one of their contractor friends.
Home & Garden | Bedbug-sniffing dogs are raising doubts for some | Seattle Times Newspaper
Saturday, November 13, 2010
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
Cooperator
October 2010 Vol. 30, No. 10
Monday, November 1, 2010
Saturday, October 30, 2010
Saturday, September 25, 2010
update: board member has no idea on who has check signing powers for co-op and doesnt see why they would want to know
worse is the sheep in the annual meeting, my fellow shareholders did not open their mouths to back me up.
The BOD members present at the meeting should have spoken up and offered this info to evereybody, but they act like puppets. It is Sad,
i rarely ask a question when dealing with the BOD or managing company that i do not know the answer to already .
This way i know if they are honest,up to date on regs and laws, or bs artists. Our co-op falls into the BS category. I also check on any answer they give meandat i am not 100% sure of. I take none at their word, they have not shown that type of integrity concerning BOD operations. In thier personal lives i believe some have outstanding integrity,let me be clear on that. I speak no ill out side of the BOD operations.
It is the the requirement under BCL, that the BOD contact information be made available, that is the law that governs NYS co-ops.
Who in their right mind would buy in a place with this kind of board. The few remaining shareholders that live in the building better step on and start reading, i have made it easy for them, i post links to articles that are related to the building
myself and one other person have fortitude and guts in this building. A bunch talk but Talk is cheap , put it in writing or it is talk, not action.
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
security problems 1 hawley terrace
Tonight aug 31, came in after a walk around 9pm and the patio top lever was opened. this woulds make it easy to jimmy the lock.
security along with maintenance is extremely lacking, I hope that when the shareholders get their maintenance increase they realize that the board gave the manging company a raise this year. If you look back on the pictures i have posted here, The pot holes in the garage and in the areas where people walk were not fixed for about a year, some were reported to barhite and holzinger, the managing company twice. This is a easily grounds for a lawsuit , if there is a trip and fall. the good news is , if the problem was pointed out to the board and managing agent, their protection under the boards indemnity insurance, may become null and void, and they will be responsible , the old lack of due diligence again. it is a shame that the few shareholders left , about 60%, not the 80% it is supposed to be let themselves be walked over and have they investment ruined by these people.
these are sheep going to slaughter, unless they fax letters and demand board of directors contact info, they are doing nothing .
Nothing was mentioned in the annual minutes about the illegal change to the method of voting for board members.
There is a free magazine called the cooperator, and it has an on- line section. There is also a web presence called the Habitat, it is all about nys co-op laws. The new york times has a co-op q & a section. i believe my letters and questions concerning this building have been in all , with all opinions favoring my position . Read and Learn
Saturday, June 12, 2010
A New Lease on Life?
The occupancy clause of the lease states that the shareholder and members of the immediate family are the only legal tenants of a co-op apartment. (Same-sex couples and unmarried heterosexual couples are protected under the New York Roommate Law.) For the nuclear family raising two school-age children, this works out simply enough. But what happens years later, when the shareholder decides to relocate to Paris but hang onto the apartment, enticing one of the now-grown children to return to the nest?
In this scenario, the meaning of the word "˜and' is the difference between a very lucky child and an illegal subtenant. "The courts have read that conjunction as very important," says Murray. And, over the years, they have also read it differently.
"One said that "˜and' means "˜or' and another court said that "˜and' does not mean "˜or,'" says Weinstein. More recently, courts have been ruling consistently in favor of the latter. A shareholder's children can only reside in the apartment when the shareholder is in residence. Otherwise, they're right alongside the rest of the city's apartment seekers, holding a broker's check in hand, in line to tour a tenth-floor walkup. In order to terminate the "and/or" debate, drafters of the CNYC's updated lease sought to write an occupancy clause with unbending definitions.
http://www.cooperator.com/articles/794/1/A-New-Lease-on-Life/Page1.html
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Board Talk / Activities / Home - Habitat Magazine
Read the responses at the habitat CO-OP magazine . A magazine everone should read, unless they don't care about losing all their monies.
Board Talk / Activities / Home - Habitat Magazine
FDIC regulators close seven banks; failures may cost insurance fund $7.33 billion
FDIC regulators close seven banks; failures may cost insurance fund $7.33 billion
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
Sunday, May 9, 2010
and the board gave barhite and holzinger a raise to manage the building
The hole in the garage was reported to barhite and holzinger management about 6 months ago.
Thursday, May 6, 2010
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Board Talk / Activities / Home - Habitat Magazine
The link above is a good site for questions and answers. It goes into depth on many aspects of coop living and the problems with managing agents and boards that pilfer the funds, which are becoming quite common in the news.
i am not saying that is happening in this building, however i do not think we have one person who is watching the books and accounting.
i noticed the managing agents operating budget monies had been tripled this year?
i think there are articles in habitat and in the cooperator where it is explained why this is a bad idea.
i remember asking a board member, which board members had check signing authority and who was the second.
They had no idea. This is a very bad sign
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Monday, May 3, 2010
Treasurer of Mt. Vernon co-op complex charged with stealing $180G | LoHud.com | The Journal News
THESE Types of frauds and thefts have been getting exposed with the dump of the economy. Rockland county co-op also had a treasurer theft.
These thefts can happen when a solo board member or a team of senior controlling BOD (board of directors) takes control of everything and doesn't pass on all information received to the other board members in a timely manner, meaning within the week received. not at the next board meeting, which in our co-op could be months away. The Board members that allow this to go on are not performing their board duties.
i have documented and written the BOD not doing their fiduciary responsibility a couple times.
The 27,000k budget zero drop may be one instance , The president of the BOD refuses to state when this problem was discovered. I asked this question again. at last years, 2009 annual meeting. The answer i received was a sarcastic That evening. The fiscal year ends in feb i believe, need to check on that, but is is not december and it is early in the year. The board meeting was in June, I asked one board member when they were told about the budget error, they said within about a week of the annual meeting. The error had to have been discovered by the end of the fiscal year , most like much sooner. Why this was not relayed to the other board members is a matter of concern. The board members themselves should have made known that they are to be informed of all board business within a week, if not the dame day.
I have written the BOD concerning their lack of fiduciary responsibility and the Inside dealing concerning the assignment of parking spaces, i get back a answer that they are doing everything correct.
At least i have laid the ground work for liability , and i doubt the BOD are indemnified in these actions.
Friday, April 23, 2010
new york times answer concerning board member absolute right to know and good comment
new york times real estate section, questions and answer concerning co-ops.
this section is great for gaining knowledge on co-op laws and is easily searched using keywords.
Real Estate
Real Estate Q&A: Gaining Access to Proxy Votes
permalink:
http://realestateqa.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/26/gaining-access-to-proxy-votes/
By By JAY ROMANO
Published: March 26, 2010
I am on the board of my Queens co-op. The president of the board always seems to know how everyone voted by proxies at the annual meeting. I’ve asked to see the proxies, and have been told that no one is allowed to see them. What is the law on this?
folllow the link for the whole question and answer,
here is the comment posted
escapefromyonkers
westchester,ny
March 31st, 2010
11:48 am
which is a reason to strip the board power to assign the parking spaces in indoor parking premium areas. They have the inside knowledge of who a shareholder voted for, and if you didnt vote their lines you will be skipped forever on the waiting list,
in my co-op at least three board members have been self dealing parking spaces to their non-shareholder children/grandchildren, skipping disabled shareholders and other shareholders on the waiting list for 10 years.
i even wrote the board and called them on it, i have my space,but will not let a board self deal. As usual they disregard the written garage rules, and no longer provide them to residents. They make believe they no longer exists.
There should be fines and economic sanctions that they are personally responsible for if caught self dealing.
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
approx 50% owner occupied
the board president is not an owner occupier, nor are some other board members.
in reality we have 50% owner occupied. That is why the building had gone to shit.
we have at least one resident that should have never moved in, should habe been evicted the first month, since he was not the shareholder.
he has caused many problems for his eifghbor, yet the board and manging company refuse to do anything. could be more inside dealing.
But 50% is real bad
going to be hard to sell , since the word is out.
Dont shoot the messenger ,thank your board
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Thursday, March 4, 2010
couple clips from the Q and A of the cooperator magazine.
i really worry about the finances since the $27,000 zero drop budget error, which no board member caught, means no one is watching the money. you can get a free subscription to the cooperator magazine. There is also an online edition that is easier to look up articles , they are all online AFAIK. cooperator.com
There is a lot of of legalize. by lawyers. A lot that relates to the problems that shareholders in this building are experiencing .
As soon as i figure out how to get my scanned page in here it will be updated.
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
optonline internet very slow
i ordered boost last month for the free trial.
for a while it was great. i was getting over 30megs download. i was faster than anyone in the area, including fios. This surprised me.
however the last week the connection slowed to a crawl, did some testing with ool and they are dispatching tomorrow.
i am always surprised how many people pay for speeds they don't get.
verizon dsl really screwed me over last year. they scammed me on the try dsl free. i went to cancel within the allotted time and turns out the verizon salesperson had lied extensively to me. They told me the conversation was being recorded. so i though i was ok. turns out they was no taped conversation. i knew they couldn't deliver the speeds they promoised , never let my cable expire, and used the dsl maybe two times, just to test the speeds. since it was half as fast as the optonline regular service, it wasn't worth the hassel to use the dsl. i followed up as far as i could. i was going to bring them to small claims court, but had too many personal items going on. it was more the principle of them scamming the customer. they use contracted salesman that promise you anything to get a sale , when you go to terminate your service within the free period, you find out that it was not 90 days, it was 30 days. i don't think i even hooked up .
i tried to get the first dsl in this building. i measured the cable impedance and had the cable records corrected. i worked for verizon at the time and i installed dsl, and specialized in cable maintenance.
I doubt anyone in this building is getting what they are paying for with verizon dsl.
i was surprised that boost was faster than verizon fios.
Sunday, December 13, 2009
missing items in official mailed 2009 minutes
The last couple years has had quite a bit missing from the minutes, items that were important and relative to the operation of the co-operative, but contrary to what the board president want made public. I say board president since i doubt the board voted on what was to be in the minutes. Maybe i will be proved wrong, time will tell.
I will follow up on this as i come across my other notes, I have been busy catching up on my stuff. I was hoping I would find some other people in the building that would look into their biggest investment. I will follow up in my own time frame, I am not selling,I have no hurry. If I was a seller I would be researching what I have written in the preceding posts and if true take action to correct, I have a feeling the banks aren't going to be giving mortgages to co-ops with under 80% owner occupied.
The spelling and sentence structure on the following is going to be poor, I have been meaning to get this on the blog for moths, but am way behind in my projects.
The building manager stated he doesn't use a recording device to ensure the correctness of the annual minutes, he stated he never has. However I remember seeing a recording device being placed on the table in the 2008 annual meeting, that was the meeting where June , vice president of the BOD went off on a tangent about the Jews and other religions and how they don’t do things the way everybody else does. I think the recording device was deep sixed after that meeting as they didn’t want evidence of her opinions on the Jewish religion.
For the record , I wrote a letter to the BOD to have June removed from the BOD due to her prejudicial anti gay remarks she made against a previous BOD member. Her fabrication of complaints in my name and Her self dealing with providing parking spaces to family members that weren't eligible.
Her son in law, the BOD president, did not recluse himself from this meeting or these issue, whereas his children were beneficiary of the parking space in question
If I had known they did not want an accurate transcript of the annual meeting I would have taped the 2009 minutes myself. 2010 will be a different story, I will make sure there is an accurate recording.
I requested that the board members contact information be either posted or included on the memos or in the minutes , one board member, stated she refused to have her contact information made available to the shareholders. The rest of the seated board was mute, my request did not show up in the annual minutes. It is a pretty apathetic building where the shareholders let the board of directors carry on like this. We always had the contact information for all board members included in the memos and annual reports. But this was back when we had transparency and the board members lived in the building.
in the written minutes it states that FIOS will come to the building next year, however the board president stated in the meeting that it would be 2 years.
I asked if any other members of the board of directors had business relationship with barhite and holzinger or were investors in the bank that john holzinger is on the BOD. There were approx three BOD missing from the annual meeting. I never received that answer and that never made it to the minutes.
there were also people present making comments against some of my questions. I had not seen some of these people before, and since many apartments have been illegally sublet, I am not sure if they were shareholders. I still am looking into this.
If you are not a shareholder, you are not allowed to be in the discussion at the annual meeting. The board knows who the shareholders are, we the shareholders do not. The board of directors has allowed so many apartment to be illegally occupied, that every apartment sold in the last 10 plus years has to be looked at , to see who the shareholder is and who is living there.
One of the board members is not a resident of the building and is not a shareholder. A couple of the other board members were not shareholders when placed on the board. Since there is no transparency, and since there are so many proprietary lease sublet violations is impossible for a shareholder to tell shareholder from illegal subtenant.
I noticed in this years minutes when it was my turn to be vilified, that I was mentioned by name three times , and the people who spoke against me from the floor were not identified, they were referred to as “others”, or “many others” . when I contest the minutes I will want the names of the “others” since the minutes are not accurate without this information.
and contrary to what the board president and manging agent say , that the annual meeting is not the place to discuss such things, it is the shareholders only time and place to address issues that have been reported but are still unresolved. Key word is reported to the BOD.
In the 2008 annual meeting an issue concerning the lack of space in the storage room for new residents was brought up. In reality the board presidents family has about 80 percent of the storage room occupied by their stuff.
The board president and wife no longer live in the building. He doesn't list his address as in Yonkers. Pretty unneighborly to be clogging up the storage room when you don't live here.
Thursday, November 26, 2009
another article in new york times about co-ops
Real Estate Q&A: When Co-op Units Are in Poor Condition
By By JAY ROMANO
Published: November 20, 2009
If an apartment in a co-op building has fallen into serious disrepair, should a prospective buyer worry that there are other such apartments in the building?
rest of article and check the comments section.
this is a very good resource to look up a lot of co-op questions.
on the right lower side across from the comments , there is a tag list with items such as coops,board makes it easy to find a lot of the coops specific stuff from the archives quickly
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
cooperator magazine answers a question on co-op president relationship with managing company owner and BOD of mortgage bank
Since there is no transparency in this in this co-op. Everything needs to be closely looked at and nothing taken at anyone's word. the shareholders are the only ones that may step up to do this since the Board of Directors has never performed any due diligence. This is evident with the complaints that i and the two or three other shareholders i have spoken too.
i doubt they did their due diligence with the new mortgage.
i hope we got a competitive deal with competitive closing costs. we did have over a year left on the old mortgage which was at an interest rate that was at least a point lower. it can still be looked at , and it should be looked at.
http://cooperator.com/articles/2000/1/QampA-Board-Ethics/Page1.html
Q&A: Board Ethics
By Michael Manzi
Article Options
* Email to Friend
* Print Article
* Remove from Favorites
* Add to Favorites
* Remove from 'Articles to Read'
* Add to 'Articles to Read'
* Comments
Q Can the president of the co-op board be in business with the managing agent company’s owner without divulging it to the shareholders or other board members? The board members were recently notified that the owner is one of the board of directors and principal owners of a new bank that the co-op has refinanced through. Our board president who is dealing with the company owner is also an investor in this bank. I think the relationship between the management company’s president/owner has compromised the board president’s fiduciary responsibilities to the shareholders. I do not believe the board president has pursued problems allegedly related to the managing company’s poor performance since he wants to be on the good side of the very wealthy and connected owner. As of this time, the shareholders have not been informed of the board president’s business dealings with the owner of the management company.
—Unethical Relationship
A “It was certainly inappropriate as a matter of corporate governance for the board president to be involved, in the manner you have described, without there being full and prior disclosure to the board,” says attorney Michael T. Manzi, of the Manhattan-based law firm Balber Pickard Maldonado & Van Der Tuin, PC. “Keep in mind that any corporate officer may be removed at any time by vote of the board, with or without cause, and a board may elect to terminate a management agreement before the expiration of its term if the agent has failed in its obligations.
“New York’s Business Corporations Law does not specifically prohibit a co-op’s director or officer from having an interest in an entity with which the co-op transacts business (such as a managing agent or a bank).
“However such transactions must be handled carefully in accordance with section 713 (“Interested Directors”) of the statute. All directors or officers of the cooperative should fully disclose any interest they might have in any entity with which the cooperative intends to do business, and the board should then examine and approve the transaction without the vote of the interested director or officer. If the vote of all the non-interested directors is insufficient under the cooperative’s bylaws to approve the transaction, then the vote of the non-interested directors must be unanimous in order to approve the transaction. The interest of the director or officer need not be divulged to the shareholders, unless a vote of the shareholders is required to approve the transaction under the corporation’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws. However, the board might nonetheless consider announcing the transaction to the shareholders, along with an explanation of why it is advantageous to the cooperative. Compliance with these standards should be noted in the board’s minutes.
“Section 713 of the Business Corporation Law also provides that the cooperative may “void” a transaction if the “material facts” of the director’s interest in the transaction or other company were not disclosed in good faith or were not known by the board and the board approved the transaction by a vote that included, and depended on, the vote of the interested director, unless it can be established that the transaction was “fair and reasonable as to the [coop] at the time it was approved by the board . . . .” Thus, the interests of the president in the managing agent and the bank, in and of themselves, are not enough to void the transactions with the managing agent or the bank unless the transactions were unfair or unreasonable. Please keep in mind that “voiding” a mortgage would be extremely difficult and problematic.
“If a cooperative would like to flatly prohibit in the future any transactions with entities in which a director or officer has an interest, or any transactions directly with a director or officer, the cooperative’s certificate of incorporation should be amended accordingly.”
Friday, November 6, 2009
Condo Fined for Forbidding Mezuzah / Web Exclusives / 2009 November / Publication Content / Home - Habitat Magazine
Condo Fined for Forbidding Mezuzah / Web Exclusives / 2009 November / Publication Content / Home - Habitat Magazine
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
one board member has always shown that he was trying to do the best for the building
if they all were like him i would never have started this blog, There definitely wouldn't be these problems. There is also another new board member that i think will work out ok too.
I still need to post the list of items missing from the annual meeting minutes.
i requested that the shareholders be provided the contact information of the board members. put it on the frequent memos we receive, or at least include it on the budget or annual correspondence.
One board member stated she didn't want that information made public, the rest were mute.
we always had the contact informqtion of all board members, back in the day when there was transparency.
i am sure most of the resident shareholders don't know that one of the board members is not a shareholder and has never lived in the building.
The president doesn't live in the building, but i think most shareholders know that.
Thursday, October 29, 2009
the gay bias remarks
Hopefully someone will step up and substantiate other things i have heard
The infamous 2F referral
the recent incident where the board member referred to another shareholder and previous board member as, " those those two, whatever they are,in a very derogatory voice.
favorite board member bias remarks
which was the most outlandish remarks made by a board member to a shareholder/resident. this is just a start, as i have time will post the plenty more.
1. Telling a shareholder they were not allowed to have the Mezuzah attached to their front door , that it had to be removed.
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
how many apartments are shareholder owner occupied
However our board president stated that the number of apartments that is owner occupied is high? he doesn't tell half the true story. The board president has been manipulating everthing he can get his hands on and the shareholders have to wake up and stop this junior Madoff scheme and take back this building.
owner occupied means exactly that.
Most of the recent sales have been in violation of the proprietary lease to parents that are having the kids or grandkids occupy the apartments. This is because the board has not been doing their job, that is it plane and simple.The building manger doesn't have a clue to what the laws are concerning co-ops or what the building house rules are, why are we paying and tipping these people?
Probably because of the business relationship/conflict of interest with the co-op president and john h.
one of the board members stated at the meeting said that she will not give out her email or her phone number, she doesn't think that shareholders should contact her.
In reality any shareholder can call her or knock on her door for any building business.
Monday, June 22, 2009
"FAIL" proxy notice for annual meeting
Another item i caught, there were a lot of notices all over the building reminding of the annual meeting. In the elevator,laundry room, mailboxes, both entrance doors. I never so so many notices reminded of the meeting. There didn't seem to be a contested election, no one had listed themselves as running in opposition. However the wording on the memo from from barhite and holzinger office was incorrect and indicative of trying to control the voting.
In the memo B and H stated to give your proxy to a board member if you were unable to attend the meeting.
the correct wording is give your proxy to a "shareholder".
I picked up on it right away, since i had read the last twenty plus years of proxy notices.
Friday, June 19, 2009
conduct of board president at annual meeting
One Hawley Terrace Co-Op Board
Subject: unprofessional conduct, Harassment, 6th grade attempt at browbeating and totally inappropriate verbal abuse and verbal attacks directed at me from board president Mike f
I asked perfectly appropriate questions during this years annual meeting, some of the questions and statement I made concerned the error I noticed in the written minutes of the 2008 meeting, board members business relationships with John Holzing, and a question on the laundry room contract. I am a shareholder who has resided in this building, before it became a co-op and am a previous board member.
I consider Mike F non-disclosed business relationship with John ha conflict of interest and want to know when this relationship began. I also want to know if any other board members are involved, a few were not present at this meeting . I have always wondered why Mike F praises B and H at these annual meetings while I see evidence of failure to perform basic manager agent functions, such as the recent roof-encapsulating project that the shareholders were accessed. I am sure this gross negligence is adding to the elevator repair bill.
I stand my statement of the incorrect distributed minutes from the 20008 meeting. In spite of mike Fs verbal browbeating and his 6th grade attempts to bully and harass me, I wasn’t embarrassed, i have a medical condition related to my disability where I react to the heat and my face flushes at above 70 degrees when I am perfectly calm. I was unprepared for the 6th grade attacks; however that will not happen again, I promise to read up on juvenile macho behavior and people that try to bully and create divisions in a community.
I also note for the record that I had written the board this summer over a couple of incidents with June K, Mike F’s mother in law. Requesting to have her removed from the board for her unethical behavior, she fabricated complaints in my name to my garage neighbors, trying to create divisions between us. She also used homophobic and racist comments when referring to a previous board member and people in the neighborhood. It looks like the family uses the same playbook.
I want to build a community and a proper function co-op, no more of these senior board members violating written garage policy and skipping the rightful shareholders and assigning the garage spots to their family and friends.
I also note that Mike F skipped the shareholders annual meeting function of the reading and accepting of last years 2008 minutes. The annual meeting shareholder template is very precise in order of events and Mike F is an expert at conducting meetings having done so for over 30 years. The accepting of the previous year minutes takes pace at the very beginning of the meeting after the quorum has been reached and officially noted. Since mike F totally skipped that requirement, much latter in the meeting when it was opened up to the floor i brought up my protest to last years written minutes. I also wish to note for the record that i did see a tape recorder on the table in front of rich P recording the 2008 minutes, however last night rich stated that he never taped last years minutes and never tapes the minutes. i will check with other co-ops. Including those managed by B and Ho and see if this is the industry standard.
The $27,000 error, which was disclosed at the 2008 annual shareholders meeting, is still not resolved. I am still not convinced proper transparency to the other board members and shareholders were followed.
I asked Mike F at the 2009 meeting when this error was discovered; he stated he discovered it approximately a week before the 2008 annual meeting, which would place his discovery in the June 2008 time frame.
He stated he, himself discovered it at this time. This issue is not closed and I will continue to look into it.
Monday, June 15, 2009
digital TV house antenna
That jack in the living room can be accessed via a sub $5 antenna cord from radio shack.
i have been using it for the last 15 plus years, since i got rid of cable tv.
the antenna provided all network tv channels 2,4,5,7,9.11.13 and maybe more uhf.
the signal was as good as cable tv's .
Naow that the digital trnasgression has changed the building need to get a adapter to provide digital TV to the building.
it basically is the same as a set top converters , but for the whole building.
i know a lot of people in these tough economic times don't want to give cablevision money they don't have to. if your interested in HBO and sports you need cablevision or FIOS ( another post).
however if you just like to watch network TV at no charge, like the old days , and use netflix or streaming movies for everything else, the rooftop antenna is great.
I get the feeling that the co-op managing board may be against the cost of converting the antenna, i think the price would be under $500, or i should say , SHOULD be under $500.
In NYC the tenants can request a rent decrease since the landlord is now providing less service.
Sunday, June 14, 2009
election, reelection board member is not a shareholderannual meeting
none of the board members bothered to enclose any reach information.
no phone numbers,emails etc.
Are there any shareholder in this building that cares what is going on?
Sunday, May 17, 2009
auction or no auction? lawyers say no, board say yes
the lawyers office told me the auction was cancelled, so they wouldn't give me any information.
Contacted a board member, who contacted the president and the building agent manger, they said the auction was still on.
This is crazy, but typical sad to say of this building.
They need to reschedule due to lawyers office not providing correct information to potential buyers, if in fact it is not cancelled.
otherwise it is a set up for a inside deal.
I believe the Bank paid off the co-op on Friday , so there is no money owed to the co-op now and the bank has the right to auction it.
This would make a lot simplifier for a buyer.
Friday, April 10, 2009
one apartment has been foreclosed
Sunday, March 29, 2009
good size rally across the street, no participation from 1 Hawley terrace?
why is that ? where is our board?
i hope this isn't a one time grandstand, i would really love to see a community organization in this neighborhood.
Saturday, March 28, 2009
Joan Gronowski District 3
Joan Gronowski is our councilperson
District 3
Office: 914.377.6313
board president is not in business with owner of managing company per john H of B&H
In my simple mind when a boardmember of a newly formed bank solicts someone to invest in their bank, it is a business dealing. Per john H letter, he has no business dealing with the board president. I use the word solict, because that is the terminolgy and word the board president used in the annaul meeting.
originail post= in case you didn't know. i didn't know until recently. Our board president has some kind of business relationship with John F. Holzinger Jr.
i don't know how long this has been going on, but i have problems with it.
i believe this was first divulged to the board members when they refinanced using John F. Holzinger Jr Bank. I think out president is a big investor in this bank.
This Bank IMO has political issues that are contrary to our neighborhood.
The Bank is a big supporter of the project on Alexander street and JFK marina.
This project would be a disaster for our neighborhood.
i always wondered why no one from our co-op board was at the meetings at city hall concerning the alex street master plan.
our building has a conflict of interest with the company we pay.
rally sunday across street
i am pretty outspoken, so i will say it here and have said it locally,
RCCY really does not act as a community organization for us. Nor would i call them our community group.
i have contacted them quite a bit in the last two years, since i first heard of them.
They only seem to have one issue , don't block their views. Now they are getting involved with the Pit , That is a good sign. The people ar the greystone buiding 1085 Warburton , must be going nuts with that disaster, imaging trying to sell if your facing that side ?
at least on this flyer they are speaking up about the disaster that forced the people next to the "PIT" out of their house , was it one or two Easter ago?
i need to check the zoning map they are trying to change to make sure our area, especially Harriman avenue is included.
i support the low rise zoning regardless, this neighborhood has nothing of a retail, social presence, so much could be done here if we had some interested people. we have a tremendous amount of open usable green space that could be put to use as a community garden .
i'm back
getting involved in the co-op was the last thing i wanted to do, since i live here and like everyone else , just want to live my life without more stress.
hopefully with warmer weather i will see people outside and try and form some support since, as far as i see we have some big problems in the building.
i will place them under separate posts so they are easy to index.
i had done quite a bit if correspondence with the managing agent, the owner of barhite and holzinger refuses to speak to me .
i found out that the owner of our managing company has been a business partner of our board president , i don't know how long this has been going on but , IMO that explains a lot of the looked over stuff. since i haven't found much of any support or feedback in this building , i am going to go big with a co-op blog, concerning the whole metro area.
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
front steps?
did the builder take the money and run ?
did the co-op make the mistake of paying for the job before it was completed and inspected?
the story about the rails being on order is pure BS , rails are cut and welded on premises in a day.
new windows on first floor stairways look good
i was thinking about the request for the windows in June's meeting and noticed that had not been installed as of last week.
i was wondering if they would still not be completed by the next annual meeting.
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Saturday, December 6, 2008
the managing agent will be asking the board for their holiday tips soon
i believe the board declined the request to tip the administration staff at b and h , maybe that is why the mailing this year have been going out late and there have been a lot of problems with maintenance bills and bookkeeping.
the super does extra work outside their contract for the building and should be tipped.
the managing agent doesn't even do the job they are paid to do , no way should they be tipped, this is not directed specifically at the current managing agent , but all the manging agents.
i member when i was on the board the managing agent at the time had the audacity to send A memo to the board requesting a tip and specifying what amount it should be.
managing agents should not be tipped, let your voices be heard, it is your maintenance monies.
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
stairs and sidewalk completion
The story is that we are awaiting the railings, the reality has to be something else.
it takes less than one day to weld and place railings .
the non shareholders here probably have more bargaining power since the tenants may be able to get a rent decrease for the amount of time the terrace stairs have been under construction, the 2 week time frame was sufficient to complete the project.
Monday, November 17, 2008
going on 4 months for stairs ?
this is [past crazy and the continued lack of communication from the top of the co-0p board, plus the vice pres and pres using their position for personal gain, and their refusal to remove themselves from discussions where they had finical interest in the outcome is just heaps more of shady dealings that will be moving forward to higher leveled.
note to co -op board members you should investigate and talk to the people that are using some board members of discriminatory and homophobic/racist actions, and not just let the president lead you down a personal liable path. do not let their personal liability become your personal liability. you are NOT indemnified for these actions, especially if you haven't performed due diligence.
Thursday, November 13, 2008
A New Board Member Asks to See Old Minutes - Real Estate Q&A Blog - NYTimes.com
A New Board Member Asks to See Old Minutes - Real Estate Q&A Blog - NYTimes.com
Monday, November 10, 2008
words of the day for president and vice president of our board
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
i dropped a couple of these in the lobby
i have nothing against RCCY even though it may sound like i do, i used to drop off their pamphlets and post them in the lobby too. The more i got involved in the city and the more meetings i went to i realized what the deal was.
RCCY really does not serve our local community. They only appear when their views and values are affected at
I agree this area should be rezoned as low rise buildings, but this neighborhood, where we live, also needs to be changed, so if you are going to make any phone calls or write any letter to city council on this topic make sure you speak up for OUR neighborhood. RCCY is only addressing their loss of views. If that area is rezoned, we are still vulnerable.
Our neighborhood needs
yellow leaflet in lobby RCCY
i have seen no evidence that that they are involved in the community in any way more than that function. i would like to get a community group organized here , i don't know how feasible that is, i think the parents that go to the children's playground have a much better feel on that possibility.
i never thought of this before, where do the people live that drop off their kids to get on the school buses?
Saturday, November 1, 2008
independent shareholders meeting to discuss the co-op
This meeting is not being organized by the board of directors of the building .
This meeting is being put together by a couple shareholders that see things are not being run well due to a too controlling board hierarchy .
There is very little if any communication in this building.
some of the board members would like to continue that and keep the shareholders in the dark.
the shareholders need to take some ownership of this building and realize if they don't speak up they will get nothing. More likely they will be screwed by their neighbor and board members.
as far as i i am concerned the recent elections of board members was a farce, the board president did not release damaging information to his reelection bid until after the elections were carried out at the annual meeting.
the information on the budget accounting error should have been made known to the other board members and shareholders when it was discovered.
the concealment of this error was a violation of the fiduciary duties if the board president.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
have we refinaced?
if we have would the board members know?
Monday, October 27, 2008
four parking spaces for one family
all you suckers are on the waiting list for going upstairs and they have a unauthorized upstairs space.
i guess that is one of the pay offs expected when your president of the board, have parking spaces assigned for yourself your wife and your two kids.
that is a violation of about a half dozen parking garage rules.
suckers
Thursday, October 23, 2008
annual meeting minutes and accounting error
looking at the minutes, i wouldn't call the accounting error a clerical error, this error caused over 8% of the proposed operating budget about $27,000 to be missing.
i also have to wonder how bad our bookkeeping is that when a $27,000 mistake like this is made, it was quietly absorbed.
think about it .
i also believe the minutes are out of order, the voting for co-op officers was done first, before the proverbial "cat was let out of the bag" before the president let the shareholders know about the $27,000 budget mistake. the meeting was held June of 2008. When was the $27,000 mistake discovered? When did the co-op board president notify the board members? The shareholders were notified at the '08 annual meeting, the board members i spoke to were notified about 5 days before the annual meeting. The ex treasure never knew because he wasn't at the annual meeting. one of the reasons that i pushed for the release of the annual meeting minutes was that i realized that the shareholders that didn't attend the meeting still didn't know about this accounting mistake.
the co-op president refusal to share the info in a timely manner with his board of directors and the shareholders may fall into a legal area.
the election itself should not stand and should not be valid,
if the share holders knew about the mistakes that were being made and being kept secret from the other board members, and the shareholders knew about the extra illegal upper level parking space the board president had fixed, i think the tipping point would have been reached way back then.
Action would have been taken back then to get a team together to run an election against these people that are on the board to get illegal extra parking spaces for their family members.
we would have put together a team to get rid of the board members that have no opinions and probably agree to everything June proposes since June illegally bypassed the next shareholder resident on the garage list for this non resident board member that hadn't closed on their apartment yet. yet another self serving board member who should get out while they can.
i was ticked off when the first assessment for the roof waterproofing was announced, that in my opinion was nothing but pure negligence on behalf of the managing agent, however if your board doesn't open their mouth and raise a peep there is nothing you can do.
this accounting error is the tipping point though, the error just keeps on growing, we have the silence on the error, the lack of minutes , the non release of error until after the election...
scammer electrical service people in the building
if we sign up with them our bill will only go up 14 percent.
i have no idea on what is going on, but generally i don't trust anybody that doesn't leave me any paperwork to look over.
i have heard a lot of negative stories about these interconnect companies, they usually promise one thing and lots of hidden charges and you end up paying more and have a hellacious time getting switched back.
Friday, October 17, 2008
please pass on this blog information to your neighbors
comment are welcome, click on the comment icon or where it says "comments".
personal attacks are not tolerated, factual information is welcome.
One of the reasons i have tried to stay away from the board for the last fifteen years is i tend to get involved in things and do not do a half-arsed job.
i would rather leave the co-op building management to the new younger and more energetic shareholders, however for some reason very few have expressed interest, and more disturbing, the ones that have expressed interest have somehow been kept off the board.
Luckily that has changed with a unexpected opening and the volunteering of one of out shareholders.
His volunteering to serve with a dysfunctional board that has intolerable personalities on it that have already caused the resignation of very good board members. These same personalities has caused good people to not volunteer for the board.
The board is a non paying function and pia function, but we need good people that are going to be fair and look out for the shareholders and not just take care of themselves.
i have experience as a prior board member and also know the proper procedure and what board members and shareholders are entitled to.
My understanding is that some board members have been improperly refused information and improperly being kept in the dark concerning the board and building activity's.
As a prior board member i know that a board member is entitled to review every record, minutes, receipt, purchase agreement and t every financial from co-op incorporation to present.
They can also include themselves on co-op buyer interviews and make sure that the persons being interviewed are the only ones that are going to reside in the apartment.
on Sept 3, 2008 i faxed a letter to the board of directors via the managing agent at barhite and holzinger. This letter was concerning improper assignment by board members extra parking spaces for their family members over waiting shareholders. It also was directed at number of problems with a particular board member. Their conduct was so intolerable and unprofessional that i knew i had to act before our building became the subject of a lawsuit and even more probable and possible, another good board member would resign.
i have since found out that as October the board members were not informed of or giving a copy of this letter by the board president.
i have been finding out more and more how little information is shared with board members by the co-op president, for him to not inform other board members is well beyond good judgment.
the cover story for the board president is that he was planning on discussing it at the next meeting. this is a pure stalling tactic.
Board members should have the opportunity to interview and research before the meeting, otherwise they are getting a one sided view.
i faxed over another letter the boards abuse of the parking rules and failure to correct. The presidents and garage manager assignment of 3 spots for their family, two upstairs. the garage rules are posted in this blog a couple pages back.
myself and other prior board members and garage managers have confronted them about this, but they continue to take extra for their family at the expense of the rightful shareholders.
i also followed up on the removal of the board member for cause. This persons intolerable behavior is so far off the charts that no way no how should they be in any managerial or board function concerning the running of One Hawley terrace.
i requested this be done quietly and move on, but over 45 days have gone by and no action has been taking. i did speak to the board president on sept 4, 2008 and he strongly disagreed with my assessment of the problem.
Now i strongly question the judgment and motives of the board president and the ability to make proper decisions. Seems trying to stack the voting and keep power within the family is much more important than having a properly functioning board.
Sunday, October 12, 2008
great gelato and espresso within walking distance
they have fresh gelato on weekends and during the week they have lunches great deserts and the best coffee around. very friendly atmosphere, i find the gelato and espresso prices very reasonable , about half of what i pay in Manhattan. the only caveat, they seem to have a plumbing problem and the bathroom is out of order.
Hastings ny 10706 antoinette's - Google Maps
Thursday, October 9, 2008
how are we paying for the stairs?
i cant remember what was the final resolution on the paying for the stairs.
i remember it was discussed at the annual shareholders meeting.
However since this is the first time in twenty five years we have not been mailed a copy of the annual minutes, i do not remember what the cost and how we were paying for the stairs.
There was a lot of talk of refinancing due to the then low interest rates.
We had a substantial prepayment penalty; if the loan cost dropped below a certain interest rate, it would seem to have been a good move.
however we have nor been updated and the board members i have spoken too have no idea on what the status is on the refinancing , the board member are also being kept in the dark
stairs, stairs what is going on with the stairs?
anyone know? seems like it is great concrete curing weather












